Reviewer's Report for the Graduate Database Class Project

Computer Science Department, Univ. of Ioannina
June 20-21, 2000

Paper Title:

Author:

Reviewer's Confidence:

Reviewer's Competence in Project Subject Matter
0 (unfamiliar) 1 (familiar) 2 (marginal) 3 (competent) 4 (strong) 5 (expert)

Reviewer's First Name:

Reviewer's Last Name:

Scores and Comments for Authors

This section WILL be sent to the author(s)

All scores range from 0-5, where the meaning depends in part upon the question

0: low, very weak, strong reject
1: mediocre, reject
2: borderline ok, weak reject
3: medium, reasonably good, marginal accept
4: very good, strong accept
5: high, exceptional, award quality

Originality:
Significance:
Correctness:
Presentation:
Relevenace:

Overall:

In case of acceptance, how much revision is required? (0=least, 5=most)

Revisions Needed:

Place give comments to authors, so that the paper can be properly revised.

Confidential Comments for the Program Committee

This section will NOT be sent to the author(s)
Place free text comments for PC only between the between the markers below.